To me for example, reading a business book is something in between, both pleasure and learning. It’s already different from reading a novel which pulls me in completely: I usually read business books in short sprints - something like one or two chapter at a time.

Then there are the programming books. Those as well, can be divided to different groups. There are the inspiration books (books related to new techniques, maybe some process ideas…) that are already a bit heavier to read than the business books, but still can be read in a similar way.

And then there are the books that require more action. You just can’t read let’s say a Rails book without trying the things in action. So, reading a book like that will force you to be next to your computer - reading and coding at the same time.

Great question, Joshua!

I actually just finished Godin’s book a couple of weeks ago. While a lot of the ideas were interesting, I must say that I prefer to read blog entries actually on a blog rather than reprinted in a book.

As to how I read, that varies quite a bit depending on sort of text it is. I almost always find it easier to read fiction than I do informational material, as a story pulls me in, but I tend to just skim over non-fiction. That’s a bit of a problem when I’m trying to better my JavaScript skills or take my freelancing to the next level, so I’m currently trying to become a more active reader by taking notes and putting things into practice right away.

I think part of the difficulty I’ve had with being an active reader in the past is that reading has been such a normal part of my life that working to improve that skill seems sort of like learning to walk all over again.

That also connects with why I read. When I read purely for enjoyment, I don’t have to practice the normal disciplines of active reading because the story/subject itself holds onto me. But when I’m trying to follow an action plan or learn a subject I’m not familiar with, the reward is largely external, and so harder for me to keep in mind.

Should reading be creative? Absolutely. But I’d distinguish between two types of creative reading. The creative reading that comes naturally, and the creative reading that requires a more active and analytical approach.

Have any thoughts, Jarkko?